CNS ENG Co., Ltd always do with economical efficiency, duration reduction, aesthetic architectural beauty and wide space utilization
construction method |
EDGE-BEAM |
---|---|
Conceptual diagram |
|
Structural shape |
|
Outline | End reinforcement type |
End plate joint type | |
Characteristic | Saving height |
Use of reliable H-BEAM | |
Excellent workability compared to existing bonding method |
|
Patent | 10-1676707 |
Column-Deck connection structure |
construction method |
VOID-SLAB |
---|---|
Conceptual | |
Structural | |
Outline | Insert hollow body into deck plate |
make plastic casting | |
Characteristic | Self weight reduction,long span |
vibration and interlayer noise reduction | |
applicable to general deck plate | |
Patent | 40-1209403 |
Hollow slim floor and hollow flat plate structure |
construction method |
CFTCOLUMN |
---|---|
Conceptual | |
Structural | |
Outline | Concrete filling in square or round steel pipe |
Concrete installation type directly from top |
|
Characteristic | Good workability |
Reduction of Columns dimension |
|
Reduction of construction period |
|
Patent | 10-2015-0079242 |
Built-up CFT column structure |
construction method |
HONEYBEAM |
---|---|
Conceptual | |
Structural | |
Outline | Improved rigidity by giving a wave to the web |
PEB SYSTEM | |
Characteristic | Longer span |
Reducing volume | |
Patent | 30-2010-0040297 |
Prefabricated beams for construction |
construction method |
SMART– FRAME |
---|---|
Conceptual | |
Structural | |
Outline | Truss structure type |
CFT is applied on stressed material |
|
Characteristic | Ultra-longer span |
Reducing deflection | |
Stable structural performance |
|
Patent | 10-1690995 |
Filled steel pipe truss structure |
CNS ENG Co., Ltd., is specialized in construction of steel structures.It has a unique
new technology as well as basic structure technic that can drastically reduce construction costs
Unit volume : TON / Monetary standard : 10000 won
construction method |
ROLL-BEAM |
---|---|
3D TYP | |
span | 20M |
Volume | 54.5 |
Cost of construction | 8,175 |
Cost comparison | 100% |
span | 30M |
Volume | 149.4 |
Cost of construction | 22,410 |
Cost comparison | 100% |
span | 40M |
Volume | 314.7 |
Cost of construction | 47,205 |
Cost comparison | 100% |
span | 50M |
Volume | 390.6 |
Cost of construction | 58,590 |
Cost comparison | 100% |
span | 60M |
Volume | 485.6 |
Cost of construction | 72,840 |
Cost comparison | 100% |
construction method |
EDGE-BEAM |
---|---|
3D TYP | |
span | 20M |
Volume | 46.9 |
Cost of construction | 7,035 |
Cost comparison | 86.1% |
span | 30M |
Volume | 120.1 |
Cost of construction | 18,015 |
Cost comparison | 80.4% |
span | 40M |
Volume | 2580.0 |
Cost of construction | 38,700 |
Cost comparison | 80.4% |
span | 50M |
Volume | 329.7 |
Cost of construction | 49,455 |
Cost comparison | 84.4% |
span | 60M |
Volume | 411.8 |
Cost of construction | 61,770 |
Cost comparison | 84.8% |
construction method |
HONEY-BEAM |
---|---|
3D TYP | |
span | 20M |
Volume | 43.6 |
Cost of construction | 7,630 |
Cost comparison | 93.3% |
span | 30M |
Volume | 105.6 |
Cost of construction | 18,480 |
Cost comparison | 82.5% |
span | 40M |
Volume | 210.0 |
Cost of construction | 36,750 |
Cost comparison | 77.9% |
span | 50M |
Volume | 262.1 |
Cost of construction | 45,876 |
Cost comparison | 78.3% |
span | 60M |
Volume | 342.2 |
Cost of construction | 56,735 |
Cost comparison | 77.9% |
construction method |
SMART–FRAME |
---|---|
3D TYP | |
span | 20M |
Volume | 35.1 |
Cost of construction | 7,020 |
Cost comparison | 85.9% |
span | 30M |
Volume | 93.4 |
Cost of construction | 18,680 |
Cost comparison | 83.4% |
span | 40M |
Volume | 183.4 |
Cost of construction | 36,680 |
Cost comparison | 77.8% |
span | 50M |
Volume | 220.9 |
Cost of construction | 44,177 |
Cost comparison | 75.4% |
span | 60M |
Volume | 267.0 |
Cost of construction | 53,400 |
Cost comparison | 73.3% |